User talk:Henryhartley

Welcome

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia, Henry Hartley!!

Thanks for the nice picture you uploaded. But i'm sorry that i must ask you for the copyright status of the oicture. Al is fine if you've taken it yourself or got it from a public domain or [GNU Free Docunentation Licence]] site. If you're not sure leave me a message on my user page. Please edit the picture page and tell us. Thanks. I've added some more infos that might be relevant for someone who is new here.

I hope you like this place and have fun editing.
We always like to meet new Wikipedians!

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you want get to know more people here, list yourself at Wikipedia:New user log, and go back there sometimes to see if you find people matching your intersts. Go to Wikipedia:Community Portal to learn more about wikipedia and ways to participate.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, or add a question to the village pump. You also can leave me a message at User talk:Lady Tenar, but it may take a few days bevore i see the message and can respond.

Here are some more tips:

If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! Lady Tenar 22:27, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Edit attribution

Hi Henry. Edits from 198.232.250.51 have now been reattributed to you. Regards — Kate Turner | Talk 02:19, 2004 Sep 4 (UTC)

Cleaver Disappointment?

I just argued on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Cleaver for

Keep, for the sense, re glacier-bearing mountains in at least western N. Amer, of a rock formation flanked by two glaciers. (Even if the term is geographically restricted, it would be either a redir to the dominant term, or the target of the redirects from all the other regional terms.) These are important features in mountaineers' planning of ascent and traverse routes, and IMO an article could discuss what they have in common, probably different categories of them, and examples that affect notable routes.

But i count 4 Del to my 1 Keep, and 14 hours left.
--Jerzy (t) 10:40, 2004 Oct 18 (UTC)

Moving pages

BTW, when you rename an article, use "move" tab at the top of the screen, because that transfers the article history as well. When you just cut-n-paste, the history of the newly-created articles makes it look as though you're the sole author. Stan 16:33, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, I didn't see that. You learn something new every day. Henryhartley 18:26, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)

cemetery

Since a) I took both pictures and I'm biased and b) you are obviously more experienced in both the Civil War and Wikipedia than I, I'll let you and others decide if the second picture should remain commented out on the Gettysburg National Cemetery page. I did want to point out that though the pictures are similar, they actually show different monuments in the cemetery, not different views of the same monument. Henryhartley 18:49, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

OK, I put it back. Sorry. The pictures are so tiny it was difficult to tell they were different. You may wish to edit the article and put a longer, more descriptive caption on each picture. Hal Jespersen 19:28, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) (My name's really Henry, too!)

Thanks for your reply. I've switched the places of the two photos since the one in the horizontal image is more central to the cemetery than the other. I also added the names of the monuments to the images. Henryhartley 20:03, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

I think that's an improvement. Hal Jespersen 20:22, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:U.S. Wikipedians' notice board/USCOTW

Hey there Henry, I noticed that you had expressed interest in the article on the Potomac River on its talk page. Another contributor nominated the river for the US Collaboration of the Week and I would appreciate it if you would give the nomination your support. I feel with minimal effort, the article will reach featured status with the assistance of a team of editors. --Caponer 18:16, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Josiah Henson Photo

Hello Henry

I was wondering if i would be able to accuire the image that you took of the "Josiah Henson" house in Bethesda Maryland.

It's a great shot and I would really appreciate it.

Thanks,

BraedonBmckinla 19:56, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

right to use an image

Hello Henry,

I saw your picture of the Mendenhall Glacier and would be interested in using it for a publication in Greece. Could you please inform me on the matter?

Thank you

Irini

What sort of publication? If you notice on the page with the picture (Mendenhall_Glacier_2004_08_15.jpg) it gives you permission to use it in conformance with the GNU Free Documentation License. If you'd like to use it outside that license, I'd like to know what your plans are. Henryhartley 13:50, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am planning to use it for an encyclopedia in Greece, non-modified and credited to you, the author. I think GNU covers that case, but I just wanted to be sure. Thanks

Yep, you're covered. If it is a print encyclopedia, I could provide you with a higher resolution version of the image. Henryhartley 13:20, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chears! I think the resolution I got is enough, but if not, allow me to bother you again.

Tongass Image

Hi Henryhartley,

I work for a publishing company and I came across your image of the Tongass Forest and would like to use in an educational science textbook I am working on. Unfortunately the size on the web is too small for print and I was wondering if you had any higher-res images of Tongass forest. Give me an email at athos2001@gmail.com All the best,

Christine :-)

Your Juneau pictures

I was browsing through some Southeast Alaska articles and came upon the pictures you took around Juneau. I was wondering if you could send me higher res versions of them for my personal use. I want them for my “home” screensaver that I watch whenever I get homesick. :-) You can message me on my user page, or try using Special:Emailuser/James_Crippen. I’ll take the largest resolution you can offer. Gunalchéesh! — Jéioosh 02:03, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rose species?

Having created a page on Griffith Buck, noticed that his (memorial) website [1] mentions Rosa laxa Semipalatinsk as a species that he used in his breeding program. Do you think Rosa laxa merits an entry in the list of rose species? Sincerely, Novickas 17:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

No idea, really. I can't say I've ever heard of it. There is not, as far as I know, any definitive list of valid species. The USDA GRIN Taxonomy for Plants has it listed with Rosa gebleriana Schrenk as a synonym. Seems reasonable, therefore to add it and see if anyone objects.

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Cyclades-Satellite.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Cyclades-Satelite.png. The copy called Image:Cyclades-Satelite.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 18:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A right to use R.V.L. Hartley's photo in the PhD thesis

Dear Sir, I think the right to use the photo of R.V.L. Hartley in the PhD thesis is covered by the GNU Free Documentation License, but I guess it is nice to ask you for your permission anyway. The photo would be used in the history of information theorem section. If you require I can email you the part of the text where I mention R. Hartley.

Best regards, Dackard S. Prot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.158.196.64 (talk) 11:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you didn't leave any way for me to contact you, I'll just answer here. Yes, it is covered by the GFDL and yes, you may use the image. I do appreciate the notice and I'd be interested in reading the final product. Henryhartley 13:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for that. I will be pleased to contact you again in few months after graduation. Best regards, Dackard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dackard (talk • contribs) 07:51, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seizo Suzuki

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Seizo Suzuki, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Seizo Suzuki. —BradV 16:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Seizo Suzuki

I have nominated Seizo Suzuki, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seizo Suzuki. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Wizardman 20:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Scotts-miracle-gro logo.gif)

You've uploaded File:Scotts-miracle-gro logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:04, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

R. V. L. Hartley, "Transmission of information" from 1928

Dear Sir,

I am contacting you for the second time. I am a PhD student who STILL has not finished his thesis.

Would you be that kind and allow me to ask you few questions regarding R. Hartley's paper "Transmission of information"? I am not sure if you are able to answer my question, if this is the case, would you be willing to discuss the topic with your father for me?

I have not asked the question yet, since it is a delicate subject. I would appreciate to discuss this in privet email if possible. If you prefer to do it publicly I would be also happy to do it as you wish.

My questions that I would like to ask you, in general concern work relationship of R. Hartley with Nyquist. It might be that somebody in your family knows something what I am interested in. This is quite important subject from the point of view of the Information Theory, and as far as I know, people still do not know the answer to some intriguing questions.

You can send me an email at dackard@ee.ucd.ie.

Thank you in advance. Best regards, Dackard Prot.

All very mysterious, I'm sure. If you have a question, ask it. Henryhartley (talk) 20:56, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Henryhartley! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

David C.H. Austin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohammed-Daoud-Khan-JAC001.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mohammed-Daoud-Khan-JAC001.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

you steel others work

The picture you have posted of uncle toms cabin in Bethesda is not yours yet i see you clam credit for it like apparently you have other pictures. That picture was taken by me and if you 1 do not remove your name and retract the information that you took that picture 2 contact anyone that you gave permission to use that picture to and inform them you are not the legal owner 3. never ever use take credit or even have possession of that picture again. If you do not do this i will come after you legally. take your own pictures you have until July 1, 2015 to completely comply with this notice. Keith Kelley 427 Pin Oak Place Frederick, MD 21701 keith7832@yahoo.com

You may feel that the picture I have of the so-called Josiah Henson Cabin is yours but I assure you that I took that particular picture. I would be interested to see what evidence you have to support your claim. I have the original image direct from my camera for that and all images of mine that appear on Wikipedia. If you have a similar photo, well, that's fine. The picture I posted is my own, however. Henryhartley (talk) 20:13, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fine if you have the original picture than we both took an exact picture from the exact same place at the exact same time of year at the exact same time of day with the exact weather and framed it exactly the same. there is an easy way to resolve this let me know how to get in touch with you and i will come by if you can convince me it is a coincidence that this the case then I will fully apologize to you and to any one else you would like. as well as give you all the respect you deserve. If you cant or are not willing to do this than I will pursue you further regardless of your response. The whole thing boils down to some one taking credit for some one else s work. My picture has been online before and can have been taken off there but I can prove my picture. I have a whole series that I took that day not just the one. If you took a picture I would be willing to bet you took more than one yourself. You can contact me Keith Kelley 301 606 3351 I am in Frederick, my email is keith7832@yahoo.com. I suggest you follow through and resolve this issue with me. Keith Kelley — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keith7832 (talk • contribs) 20:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Henryhartley. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 12:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Mdann52 (talk) 12:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josiah-henson-cabin-img-034510.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Josiah-henson-cabin-img-034510.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:55, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Henryhartley. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Henryhartley. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]